How we rank
How we decide the best headphones for music listening: the headphones music lovers actually recommend, counted. Here is exactly what that means.
What we count
For every pair on the list we check public discussions on Head-Fi, the Steve Hoffman and AudioKarma forums, the What Hi-Fi forum, ResetEra, Hacker News and similar places, plus comments under YouTube reviews. Reddit is not included: Reddit no longer grants data access for this kind of use. We look for recommendations and ownership statements for each headphone. As of Sep 2026, the per-headphone totals add up to 1,698 recommendation reports and 2,325 ownership reports across 31 headphones. Those are model-level totals: one person can appear under several headphone models, so they are not unique people across the whole list. The cards link to 206 threads and videos with evidence.
Research coverage
The saved set covers 88,909 screened YouTube comments from 252 videos, 13,749 customer reviews, and 14 social posts across 31 headphone models. Store reviews cover 28 of those 31 models; coverage is uneven. Most comments are screened automatically by a model-name checker; these totals do not mean a person read every item by hand. For YouTube, repeat comments are collapsed using normalized text, saved author and exact timestamp. This catches copied records, but it cannot prove that different comments came from different people. Store reviews and social posts are validated against their product pages and checked for repeated source IDs and copied text. A review a store labels as copied from the maker's own site, or as an employee or incentivized review, is kept on file but not counted. Customer reviews and social posts are reported separately from the recommendation ranking.
Public forum discussions contribute to the recommendation ranking, but we do not add them to the raw coverage totals because there is no saved record of every forum post screened. The total of recommendation and ownership reports also is not a count of unique people across the site: the same person can be counted under different headphone models, and people can recommend a pair without owning it.
The pipeline, step by step
Everything on the site comes out of one repeatable process. Here it is in order, so you can judge where a number might be weak.
- Choose the models. A headphone joins the list when it is already named often in the comments we have saved, not because a maker asked. The current list has 31 models.
- Collect the comments. For each model we pull the comments under the most-watched YouTube review videos through YouTube's official data interface, about a dozen videos per model, top-level comments only. We re-collect roughly monthly and rebuild every count from the same snapshot so pages agree with each other.
- Decide what each comment says. Plain word rules run on the one sentence that names the model: a recommendation needs words like "get the" or "love my"; ownership needs words like "I have" or "had mine for"; a question never counts; a denial ("but not the XM5", "don't own") cancels ownership. Every rule has a test, and a new rule cannot ship without a test for the sentence it must not catch.
- Count per model. Recommenders and owners are counted as distinct commenters per model. The leaderboard is that recommender count, highest first.
- Count per pair. For comparison pages we look only at comments that name both models in the same breath and count the ones that choose a side in plain words ("prefer X over Y", "upgraded from Y to X"). A winner is named only when at least 5 comments choose and one side has twice the other.
- Count per use. For use-case pages a comment must name the model, recommend or own it, and mention the use (classical, commuting, no amp and so on) with a fixed word list. A model needs 3 such comments to show a number.
- Store reviews, kept separate. Customer reviews from retailer and maker pages are collected in full with the reviewer's name and date, either by reading the store's public review feed or by reading the page in a real browser. Every saved review is then checked again against the live page, and anything that does not match word for word is thrown out. Reviews the store labels as copied from the maker, incentivized or written by staff are not counted. These totals appear on the home page and here; they never move the ranking.
- Quotes. A quote on the site is a whole sentence of twelve words or fewer, never trimmed, never edited, linked to the video it came from. No quote is ever taken from a store review.
- Label the evidence. Comparison and use pages carry a Limited, Moderate or Strong label from the counts behind them, explained below.
The four numbers on every card
- People recommending: recommendation reports attached to that headphone, counted from forum usernames and YouTube channels where available. A person can appear more than once across platforms or headphone models.
- Say they own it: ownership reports attached to that headphone, counted separately.
- Mentions: posts and comments naming that headphone, whether or not they recommend it.
- Posts read: source posts and comments screened for that headphone. Most YouTube comments are checked automatically, so this is not a claim that a person read every item by hand.
Recommendations and ownership are decided by plain word rules (for example "get the", "love my", "had mine for", and not "don't get the"). The rules are public in the site's code and are deliberately conservative.
We also separate owners (people who say they use the pair) from secondhand recommendations (people passing on what they have heard). The card shows both.
What the count means, and what it does not
A high count means recommendations for the pair appear often in the sources we checked. That is useful when you know nothing about headphones. It is not a measurement of sound quality. A pair can be popular because it is cheap, easy to find, or has been around for years. That is why every card also lists what owners complain about and where opinions split.
Evidence levels
Comparison and use-case pages carry a label that says how much sits behind the ranking, so a page built on a handful of comments never looks as sure as one built on hundreds. On a comparison the label counts comments that explicitly choose one side: Limited below 10, Moderate from 10, Strong from 30. On a use-case page it counts the comments that name a headphone, recommend or own it, and mention that use: Limited below 50, Moderate from 50, Strong from 150. A limited page still shows real counts; it just should not settle an argument.
Prices
The price on each card is the typical US price we saw on the date shown. Where owners repeatedly mention a lower sale range, the card shows that next to the checked price; both are real, one is what you pay today and the other what patient buyers paid. Prices move; the button takes you to the live price.
How we make money
Some buy buttons are affiliate links. If you buy through one we may earn a small commission at no cost to you. Affiliate rates never affect the order; the order is the count, most recommended first. No maker has paid to be on this page.
What we will never do
- Invent users, reviews, or star ratings.
- Copy other people's comments and present them as ours.
- Move a pair up because it pays more.